Business OwnershipAntitrust History

    History of Price-Fixing: Why the 1960s "Phases of the Moon" Case Predicts the HVAC Lawsuit Outcome

    The HVAC price-fixing allegations aren't without precedent. For over a century, cartels in the building trades have been caught, prosecuted, and broken. Here's what happened before - and what it means for Berg v. Bosch.

    Mark Cantrell
    Mark Cantrell

    CEO, Upward Bound Media LLC

    March 29, 2026
    12 min read
    Share this article:

    This is part of our comprehensive HVAC Price-Fixing Lawsuit Resource Hub.

    1960s corporate boardroom meeting depicting the kind of secret price-fixing conspiracy between electrical equipment manufacturers

    Illustration: The 1960s Electrical Equipment Conspiracy involved secret meetings where executives coordinated bids using a "phases of the moon" schedule.

    SECTION 01

    What Is the Sherman Antitrust Act?

    The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is the foundational U.S. federal law that prohibits business activities deemed anticompetitive. Section 1 specifically outlaws "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade." Violations can result in criminal imprisonment, corporate fines, and civil treble damages - meaning plaintiffs can recover three times the actual harm caused.

    The HVAC price-fixing complaint (Berg v. Bosch, 2026) is filed under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. This is the same law that has been used to break up cartels in every major industry over the past 130 years, from Standard Oil to the modern auto parts conspiracy.

    TREBLE DAMAGES // SHERMAN ACT

    Under the Sherman Act, if these manufacturers are found guilty, they face Treble Damages. This means they must pay 3× the total overcharge back to the victims. For a $31 billion industry, this could be the largest financial settlement in the history of the trades.

    SECTION 02

    From "Phases of the Moon" to "Public Signaling": How Cartels Evolved

    INTELLIGENCE BRIEFING // CARTEL EVOLUTION

    In the 1960s, General Electric and Westinghouse executives used a literal "phases of the moon" schedule to rotate who would win bids. They met in hotel rooms, used codenames from phone books, and divided up government contracts according to a lunar calendar.

    Today, the HVAC "Big Seven" are accused of a more sophisticated version: Public Signaling. Instead of meeting in hotel rooms, they allegedly use public earnings calls and industry publications like ACHR News to broadcast price hikes, ensuring no one "breaks rank" and lowers prices to win market share. The mechanism evolved. The outcome - artificially inflated prices - allegedly stayed the same.

    The legal challenge is different now. In 1961, prosecutors had hotel receipts and coded phone records. In 2026, the Berg v. Bosch plaintiffs must prove that public earnings calls and ACHR News price announcements served the same coordinating function - without the smoking-gun evidence of a hotel room meeting.

    SECTION 03

    The 1960s Electrical Equipment Conspiracy

    The most direct historical parallel to the current HVAC case is the Great Electrical Conspiracy of the late 1950s and early 1960s. General Electric, Westinghouse, and 27 other manufacturers of turbines, transformers, and circuit breakers were found guilty of conspiring to fix prices on electrical equipment worth billions of dollars.

    The conspiracy worked remarkably similarly to what is alleged in the HVAC case:

    • Secret meetings at trade association events and hotel rooms where executives divided up bids
    • Rotating "price leadership" using the infamous "phases of the moon" schedule to assign which company submitted the lowest bid
    • Coded communications using phone books and aliases to coordinate pricing
    • Public price announcements that served as signals to competitors - the original "public signaling"

    CASE OUTCOME // 1961

    7 executives sentenced to federal prison - the first criminal imprisonment for antitrust violations in U.S. history.

    $500 million+ in damages awarded (equivalent to $5+ billion in today's dollars).

    Competitive pricing returned to the electrical equipment market. Innovation accelerated as companies had to compete on value rather than coordinated margins.

    SECTION 04

    Historical Price-Fixing Cases: Then vs. Now

    Every major antitrust case shares a common pattern. The table below maps the historical strategy to its modern HVAC equivalent - the connection that prosecutors in Berg v. Bosch are expected to draw.

    CaseYearThe StrategyModern HVAC ParallelOutcome
    GE/Westinghouse Conspiracy1960–1961Secret Hotel MeetingsPublic Investor Calls7 executives imprisoned, $500M+ damages
    Lysine Price-Fixing (ADM)1996Executive ConspiracyCFO 'Price Discipline' Statements$100M fine, exec imprisonment
    Auto Parts Cartel2011–2016Global Component MonopoliesMidea/Gree OEM Partnerships48 companies, $2.9B in fines
    LCD Panel Price-Fixing2008–2012Global Supply RestrictionFactory Production Cuts$1.4B in fines, class action settlements
    Gypsum Board Conspiracy2013–2016Coordinated 'Announced' HikesACHR News Price Announcements$700M+ in settlements
    Berg v. Bosch (HVAC)2026–Public SignalingAll of the abovePending
    SECTION 05

    What Happens to Prices After a Cartel Is Broken?

    Historical data shows that prices in cartelized industries typically decline 15–25% within 2–3 years of successful prosecution. After the electrical equipment conspiracy was broken, competitive bidding returned and innovation accelerated as companies had to compete on value rather than coordinated pricing.

    Data visualization showing HVAC equipment price decline pattern following antitrust prosecution of manufacturer cartels

    Historical pattern: Equipment prices decline 15-25% within 2-3 years after cartel prosecution.

    HISTORICAL PATTERN // CARTEL PRICE COLLAPSE

    Cartel Active

    Prices inflated 15–25% above competitive levels

    Prosecution Filed

    Legal proceedings begin; market uncertainty

    Price Decline (2–3 Years)

    Competitive pricing returns; 15–25% correction

    The pattern is consistent across industries: once the coordination mechanism is disrupted, competitive forces return. For HVAC contractors, this could mean meaningful equipment cost relief if the lawsuit succeeds - but the timeline is measured in years, not months.

    SECTION 06

    A Veteran's Perspective: Why This History Matters Today

    Mark Cantrell

    MARK CANTRELL // 15-YEAR TRADES VETERAN

    "I've watched these manufacturers operate for 15 years. In the past, if copper dropped, we saw 'seasonal specials' or rebates. Since 2020, that stopped. Completely. No matter what happened with raw material costs, the prices only went one direction."

    "History shows that when companies stop competing on price, they start 'cooperating' on margins. The 1960s Electrical case proved that no company is 'too big to jail.' This 2026 case is the first time in my career the HVAC industry is facing that same level of scrutiny."

    "I'm not a lawyer and I'm not making predictions. But I've been in enough crawl spaces and equipment rooms to know when something doesn't add up. And the numbers haven't added up since 2020."

    - Mark Cantrell, CEO of Upward Bound Media LLC

    FAQ

    Frequently Asked Questions

    The Lesson of History

    When cartels break, the market becomes volatile. Prices may drop 20%, but only after years of legal battles. To survive the "squeeze" in the meantime, you must build a brand that doesn't rely on manufacturer rebates.

    The contractors who control their own lead flow - not just their costs - are the ones who thrive through market upheaval.

    Protect your business with a fully optimized Google Business Profile, consistent review velocity, and an SEO website that ranks. Explore our complete HVAC marketing & SEO system.